| Author | Message |
Leave the polygamist alone already... Whose with me. | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
me Oh Dear, I am a Dirty Cunt for you | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I stay Woke.
Two Fish 2008, Upstream/Downstream: Master Teacher, Healer, Leader, Of Hope, At Peace, To Sanctuary, In Redemption, Living Gifts unto Life and Light. http://prince.org/msg/100/264513 | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
http://cbs5.com/national/...66760.html
| |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
How much you want to bet the Mormons won't be challenging these marriages. I stay Woke.
Two Fish 2008, Upstream/Downstream: Master Teacher, Healer, Leader, Of Hope, At Peace, To Sanctuary, In Redemption, Living Gifts unto Life and Light. http://prince.org/msg/100/264513 | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
At least put it to a vote in Utah. | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: How much you want to bet the Mormons won't be challenging these marriages.
I really don't understand the opposition to gay marriage. | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: How much you want to bet the Mormons won't be challenging these marriages.
I really don't understand the opposition to gay marriage. It gives the religious bullies a sense of validation to be able to force themselves on the people of this country. I stay Woke.
Two Fish 2008, Upstream/Downstream: Master Teacher, Healer, Leader, Of Hope, At Peace, To Sanctuary, In Redemption, Living Gifts unto Life and Light. http://prince.org/msg/100/264513 | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:
While I think this practice largely has roots in women's subservience, if people are happy let them That is precisely why I don't think we should just "let them." One man having a multitude of wives is one of the most explicit forms of male dominance. Personally, I believe monogamy is an archaic conception, but the fact that this particular practice so obviously favours men is sickening. The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.
"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism." | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PurpleKnight said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:
While I think this practice largely has roots in women's subservience, if people are happy let them That is precisely why I don't think we should just "let them." One man having a multitude of wives is one of the most explicit forms of male dominance. Personally, I believe monogamy is an archaic conception, but the fact that this particular practice so obviously favours men is sickening. well there is little you can do to convince these broads otherwise. Aside from kidnapping and re-educating them you might as well leave them alone. I stay Woke.
Two Fish 2008, Upstream/Downstream: Master Teacher, Healer, Leader, Of Hope, At Peace, To Sanctuary, In Redemption, Living Gifts unto Life and Light. http://prince.org/msg/100/264513 | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
a family is a family is a family.
|
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: a family is a family is a family.
and don't come at me with all this "oh, so marrying your brother and a coyote and a pack of cards is cool with you too, HUH HUH HUH?!?" - we're talking about consenting adults who know what the hell they're doing and who want to take the formation of a family seriously, just like EVERY married couple should do. [Edited 11/17/08 18:19pm] I don't see anything wrong with being critical. A gay married couple is fine with me because it's merely the communion of two consenting adults wishing to express their devotion to each other. On the opposite end, there really is a misogynistic undertone to these polygamous marriages that stops me from being able to accept them. I would be fine if the wives in these marriages were allowed multiple husbands as well, but as it is, it's gender biased. I oppose polyandry for the same reason. Sure, they're consenting adults, but women have been socialized into accepting patriarchal practices since they were born. So, the freedom to choose carries a lot of coercion. The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.
"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism." | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think Polygamists should be left to their secret society.
Join my Astrology Forum: http://scorpioland.ning.com/
Read my blog: http://synthia-rose.blogs...lysis.html | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
PurpleKnight said: Anxiety said: a family is a family is a family.
and don't come at me with all this "oh, so marrying your brother and a coyote and a pack of cards is cool with you too, HUH HUH HUH?!?" - we're talking about consenting adults who know what the hell they're doing and who want to take the formation of a family seriously, just like EVERY married couple should do. [Edited 11/17/08 18:19pm] I don't see anything wrong with being critical. A gay married couple is fine with me because it's merely the communion of two consenting adults wishing to express their devotion to each other. On the opposite end, there really is a misogynistic undertone to these polygamous marriages that stops me from being able to accept them. I would be fine if the wives in these marriages were allowed multiple husbands as well, but as it is, it's gender biased. I oppose polyandry for the same reason. Sure, they're consenting adults, but women have been socialized into accepting patriarchal practices since they were born. So, the freedom to choose carries a lot of coercion. from that perspective, i agree with you at least in that a little scrutiny never hurt anyone (or their wives). |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SynthiaRose said: Someone posted something a few weeks ago about a woman marrying a family of brothers. All the brothers. I. CANNOT. GET. THIS. OUT. OF . MY. HEAD. . ![]() -I'm the opposite of moderate, immaculately polished with the spirit of a hustler and the swagger of a college kid.- | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
this is all I have to say on this here
Wøü£Ð Ü ®üñ Tö Më
Ïf §ømëböÐÿ Hü®t Ü E¥ëñ Ïf Thät §ømëböÐÿ Wä§ Mè | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
okay, look.
|
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I guess they believe they will be rewarded in the afterlife for all the misery they suffer now grrrrrrr | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Polygamy is sick and demeaning, but, leave polyamoury alone. Real Men Wear Dresses*
*if anyone has a clue what I'm referring to, you get a cookie | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm for polyandry too, and what relationship dynamic has been more patriarchal and male dominated than monogamy? | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: I'm for polyandry too, and what relationship dynamic has been more patriarchal and male dominated than monogamy?
That's an excellent point, actually. It's a little hard IMO to justify being against polygamy with the reason that it's demeaning to women -though it undoubtedly is -when so-called traditional male/female pairings are just as bad. Real Men Wear Dresses*
*if anyone has a clue what I'm referring to, you get a cookie | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: lilgish said: I'm for polyandry too, and what relationship dynamic has been more patriarchal and male dominated than monogamy?
That's an excellent point, actually. It's a little hard IMO to justify being against polygamy with the reason that it's demeaning to women -though it undoubtedly is -when so-called traditional male/female pairings are just as bad. I think you're missing the point. While every interpersonal relationship will inevitably be affected by patriarchal values, the exact extent is what is important. Polygamy is the ultimate expression of female subservience; several women working cooperatively to please their one man. As a side note, to attempt to justify polyandry is just hypocritical. It's just another form of gender bias. The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.
"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism." | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PurpleKnight said: I think you're missing the point. While every interpersonal relationship will inevitably be affected by patriarchal values, the exact extent is what is important. Polygamy is the ultimate expression of female subservience; several women working cooperatively to please their one man. As a side note, to attempt to justify polyandry is just hypocritical. It's just another form of gender bias. How so? Real Men Wear Dresses*
*if anyone has a clue what I'm referring to, you get a cookie | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: I don't see several women working to pelase one man as necessarily a greater example of female subserviance than one. It's just more people.
You must be kidding. The difference is that polygamy is structured in such a way that the direct implication is that a man's needs are superior. While the man gets to enjoy the emotional and physical gifts of several women, all of them are only worth a mere portion of a single person. As a side note, to attempt to justify polyandry is just hypocritical. It's just another form of gender bias. How so? I simply see it as a form of reverse sexism. The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.
"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism." | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PurpleKnight said: meow85 said: I don't see several women working to pelase one man as necessarily a greater example of female subserviance than one. It's just more people.
How so? I simply see it as a form of reverse sexism. Fair enough. What's your take on polyamoury, then? Real Men Wear Dresses*
*if anyone has a clue what I'm referring to, you get a cookie | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: PurpleKnight said: I simply see it as a form of reverse sexism. Fair enough. What's your take on polyamoury, then? I think polyamoury is absolutely wonderful, but the difficulty of maintaining it without it transforming into a gender-biased form (such as I believe polygamy and polyandry to be) is always of concern. Compersion is an ideal mindset to achieve, but it requires overcoming years of socialization into the belief that romantic love is synonymous with entitlement over one's sexuality. All in all, I really do believe monogamy is an archaic conception. The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.
"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism." | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PurpleKnight said: meow85 said: Fair enough. What's your take on polyamoury, then? I think polyamoury is absolutely wonderful, but the difficulty of maintaining it without it transforming into a gender-biased form (such as I believe polygamy and polyandry to be) is always of concern. Compersion is an ideal mindset to achieve, but it requires overcoming years of socialization into the belief that romantic love is synonymous with entitlement over one's sexuality. All in all, I really do believe monogamy is an archaic conception. Oddly enough, we were just talking about polyamoury today in Philosophy.... Real Men Wear Dresses*
*if anyone has a clue what I'm referring to, you get a cookie | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: PurpleKnight said: I think polyamoury is absolutely wonderful, but the difficulty of maintaining it without it transforming into a gender-biased form (such as I believe polygamy and polyandry to be) is always of concern. Compersion is an ideal mindset to achieve, but it requires overcoming years of socialization into the belief that romantic love is synonymous with entitlement over one's sexuality. All in all, I really do believe monogamy is an archaic conception. Oddly enough, we were just talking about polyamoury today in Philosophy.... I'm a Philosophy major. I view sexuality as a potential means to erase the illusion of separation between people. When sex is used to both celebrate and promulgate love between various people, I believe the phenomenon is one of collective transcendence. The impediment to this is, of course, personal jealousy. Jealousy is nothing more than an expression of insecurity and has no place in a so-called sophisticated thinking being. It is the inevitable reaction of a perceived threat to ownership of a partner's sexuality. I really, truly hope this irrationality can be overcome. I believe it can, but gradually. The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.
"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism." | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PurpleKnight said: meow85 said: Oddly enough, we were just talking about polyamoury today in Philosophy.... I'm a Philosophy major. I view sexuality as a potential means to erase the illusion of separation between people. When sex is used to both celebrate and promulgate love between various people, I believe the phenomenon is one of collective transcendence. The impediment to this is, of course, personal jealousy. Jealousy is nothing more than an expression of insecurity and has no place in a so-called sophisticated thinking being. It is the inevitable reaction of a perceived threat to ownership of a partner's sexuality. I really, truly hope this irrationality can be overcome. I believe it can, but gradually. I agree. I think we're capable of getting past things like jealousy, but it would take a lot of work and I'm not sure where we'd start. Real Men Wear Dresses*
*if anyone has a clue what I'm referring to, you get a cookie | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: PurpleKnight said: I'm a Philosophy major. I view sexuality as a potential means to erase the illusion of separation between people. When sex is used to both celebrate and promulgate love between various people, I believe the phenomenon is one of collective transcendence. The impediment to this is, of course, personal jealousy. Jealousy is nothing more than an expression of insecurity and has no place in a so-called sophisticated thinking being. It is the inevitable reaction of a perceived threat to ownership of a partner's sexuality. I really, truly hope this irrationality can be overcome. I believe it can, but gradually. I agree. I think we're capable of getting past things like jealousy, but it would take a lot of work and I'm not sure where we'd start. With a smile and a martini. [Edited 11/18/08 23:39pm] The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.
"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism." | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |