independent and unofficial
Prince fan community site
Tue 6th Jan 2009 2:51am
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Politics & Religion > Leave the polygamist alone already...
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 2 12>
Add a reply to this topic   Create new topic   Printable version   (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
AuthorMessage
Thread started 11/17/08 2:48pm

lilgish

avatar

Leave the polygamist alone already...

Whose with me.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 11/17/08 2:50pm

Torres

avatar

me wave

Oh Dear, I am a Dirty Cunt for you
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 11/17/08 2:50pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

wave

While I think this practice largely has roots in women's subservience, if people are happy let them. I know I sure as hell can't share a husband lol

I stay Woke.

Two Fish 2008, Upstream/Downstream: Master Teacher, Healer, Leader, Of Hope, At Peace, To Sanctuary, In Redemption, Living Gifts unto Life and Light.

http://prince.org/msg/100/264513
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 11/17/08 2:53pm

lilgish

avatar

http://cbs5.com/national/...66760.html

Polygamist Group Creates Commune In Utah Caves


ROCKLAND RANCH, Utah. (CBS) ― Down a red dirt road, in the middle of Utah's Southeastern desert, a worn wooden sign welcomes lost hikers - because unless you knew how to find it, getting lost is likely the only way you would stumble across Rockland Ranch. From afar, you almost think you're hallucinating from the heat. But as you get closer, you can see it's no mirage - there is a community of modern day cave dwellers living on the side of this sandstone plateau.

There are close to 80 people living inside more than 15 different caves.
But to really understand how Rockland ranch and its inhabitants, you have to learn about Bob Foster-- the man who started it all.

"He was idealistic," said Melinda Foster Morrison, Bob Foster's daughter.

Foster was born in 1925 in Oregon. He converted to Mormonism at the age of 18 and was passionate about his religion. But at the age of 46 in 1971, he converted to fundamentalism, divorced his wife, left his family, and started practicing polygamy - for which he was excommunicated from the LDS church. Shortly after, his life in a cave began.

"He was a dreamer," Melinda said. "He had dreams and he knew how to fulfill them."

Bob started expanding his family - marrying 3 more women and had 28 more children including Melinda Foster Morrison, who says her father's decision to move his growing family to the desert was pure inspiration. After spending 20 days in jail for bigamy in 1974, Bob decided to leave mainstream society.

"He saw this rock and he just saw it knew that was where he wanted to build," Melinda said.

He had worked as a miner, and knew a thing or two about explosives. He had a vision, so he started blasting and built the first cave to house his family. Catrina Foster moved to the ranch after marrying Bob's son, Enoch.

"I thought he was nuts," Catrina said. "I told him I don't want to go out in the middle of nowhere in the desert."

She thought like most people do when they hear about cave-dwellers.

"My guess was as crazy as anybody else's-- you live in a cave?" Catrina said.

But if you're expecting the Flintstones, you'll be very disappointed. Catrina lives in a cave, blasted open with dynamite with her husband, her children, and her sister-wife, Lillian. They are polygamist. But only about half of the residents practice plural marriage. Life at Rockland Ranch is surprisingly ordinary and extraordinary all at the same time. Mornings start with chores; everyone helps. There is much to be done in a community that is almost entirely self-sufficient.

"We try to do the solar panels for the power," said Lillian Foster.

The rest of their electricity comes from generators. They have wells for water, a barn full of animals, and a community garden, from which everyone takes what they need and leaves the rest for the neighbors in the cave next door. The ranch's land is leased from the state and Catrina and Lily's husband is licensed to blast the rock with explosives.

"It shakes a little," Catrina said. "You can hear it echo clear through the canyons."

Everyone works together building new cave-homes which from the inside, you might forget are caves, except for the spots of red-rock on the ceiling and walls. Each room has windows so they can maximize sunlight and conserve energy.

"It keeps a great temperature all year round, it's unique," Lillian Foster said.

They do their shopping in nearby Moab or Monticello where many of the community members work, but they said once you move here, you don't ever want to leave.

"We get to live with people that we love, that we are really close to, and I just love the environment of this place," Melinda Foster Morrison said.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 11/17/08 2:54pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

How much you want to bet the Mormons won't be challenging these marriages. neutral

I stay Woke.

Two Fish 2008, Upstream/Downstream: Master Teacher, Healer, Leader, Of Hope, At Peace, To Sanctuary, In Redemption, Living Gifts unto Life and Light.

http://prince.org/msg/100/264513
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 11/17/08 2:55pm

lilgish

avatar

At least put it to a vote in Utah.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 11/17/08 2:58pm

lilgish

avatar

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

How much you want to bet the Mormons won't be challenging these marriages. neutral


I really don't understand the opposition to gay marriage.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 11/17/08 3:01pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

lilgish said:

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

How much you want to bet the Mormons won't be challenging these marriages. neutral


I really don't understand the opposition to gay marriage.

It gives the religious bullies a sense of validation to be able to force themselves on the people of this country.

I stay Woke.

Two Fish 2008, Upstream/Downstream: Master Teacher, Healer, Leader, Of Hope, At Peace, To Sanctuary, In Redemption, Living Gifts unto Life and Light.

http://prince.org/msg/100/264513
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 11/17/08 3:19pm

PurpleKnight

avatar

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

wave

While I think this practice largely has roots in women's subservience, if people are happy let them


That is precisely why I don't think we should just "let them." One man having a multitude of wives is one of the most explicit forms of male dominance.

Personally, I believe monogamy is an archaic conception, but the fact that this particular practice so obviously favours men is sickening.

The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.

"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism."
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 11/17/08 3:32pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

PurpleKnight said:

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

wave

While I think this practice largely has roots in women's subservience, if people are happy let them


That is precisely why I don't think we should just "let them." One man having a multitude of wives is one of the most explicit forms of male dominance.

Personally, I believe monogamy is an archaic conception, but the fact that this particular practice so obviously favours men is sickening.

well there is little you can do to convince these broads otherwise. Aside from kidnapping and re-educating them you might as well leave them alone.

I stay Woke.

Two Fish 2008, Upstream/Downstream: Master Teacher, Healer, Leader, Of Hope, At Peace, To Sanctuary, In Redemption, Living Gifts unto Life and Light.

http://prince.org/msg/100/264513
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 11/17/08 6:19pm

Anxiety

avatar

moderator

a family is a family is a family.

and don't come at me with all this "oh, so marrying your brother and a coyote and a pack of cards is cool with you too, HUH HUH HUH?!?" - we're talking about consenting adults who know what the hell they're doing and who want to take the formation of a family seriously, just like EVERY married couple should do. talk to the hand
[Edited 11/17/08 18:19pm]

sometimes a vegetarian is just a vegetarian
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 11/17/08 6:39pm

PurpleKnight

avatar

Anxiety said:

a family is a family is a family.

and don't come at me with all this "oh, so marrying your brother and a coyote and a pack of cards is cool with you too, HUH HUH HUH?!?" - we're talking about consenting adults who know what the hell they're doing and who want to take the formation of a family seriously, just like EVERY married couple should do. talk to the hand
[Edited 11/17/08 18:19pm]


I don't see anything wrong with being critical. A gay married couple is fine with me because it's merely the communion of two consenting adults wishing to express their devotion to each other.

On the opposite end, there really is a misogynistic undertone to these polygamous marriages that stops me from being able to accept them. I would be fine if the wives in these marriages were allowed multiple husbands as well, but as it is, it's gender biased.

I oppose polyandry for the same reason.

Sure, they're consenting adults, but women have been socialized into accepting patriarchal practices since they were born. So, the freedom to choose carries a lot of coercion.

The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.

"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism."
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 11/17/08 6:40pm

SynthiaRose

avatar

I think Polygamists should be left to their secret society.

I personally would join them if I found the right husband... or husbands.
I do believe you can love more than one person at a time ...

Someone posted something a few weeks ago about a woman marrying a family of brothers.

All the brothers.

I. CANNOT. GET. THIS. OUT. OF . MY. HEAD.


I'd try it.... but only for like a month or so.

I really think they should offer public passes & retreats so people can try it out.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 11/17/08 6:54pm

Anxiety

avatar

moderator

PurpleKnight said:

Anxiety said:

a family is a family is a family.

and don't come at me with all this "oh, so marrying your brother and a coyote and a pack of cards is cool with you too, HUH HUH HUH?!?" - we're talking about consenting adults who know what the hell they're doing and who want to take the formation of a family seriously, just like EVERY married couple should do. talk to the hand
[Edited 11/17/08 18:19pm]


I don't see anything wrong with being critical. A gay married couple is fine with me because it's merely the communion of two consenting adults wishing to express their devotion to each other.

On the opposite end, there really is a misogynistic undertone to these polygamous marriages that stops me from being able to accept them. I would be fine if the wives in these marriages were allowed multiple husbands as well, but as it is, it's gender biased.

I oppose polyandry for the same reason.

Sure, they're consenting adults, but women have been socialized into accepting patriarchal practices since they were born. So, the freedom to choose carries a lot of coercion.


from that perspective, i agree with you at least in that a little scrutiny never hurt anyone (or their wives).

sometimes a vegetarian is just a vegetarian
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 11/17/08 7:19pm

Christopher

avatar

SynthiaRose said:



Someone posted something a few weeks ago about a woman marrying a family of brothers.

All the brothers.

I. CANNOT. GET. THIS. OUT. OF . MY. HEAD.


.



-I'm the opposite of moderate, immaculately polished with the spirit of a hustler and the swagger of a college kid.-
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 11/17/08 7:43pm

Flowers2

avatar

this is all I have to say on this here

http://prince.org/msg/105/286823

fraternal polyandry!! - when a woman has more than one husband woot! .. if men want to have more than one wife, then doggoneit... they need to legalize it for women to have more than one husband and that's that lol nod make EVERYTHING EVEN.. nod


lol and of course I'm joking lol... I do not agree with polygamy

Wøü£Ð Ü ®üñ Tö Më
Ïf §ømëböÐÿ Hü®t Ü
E¥ëñ Ïf Thät §ømëböÐÿ Wä§ Mè
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 11/17/08 8:03pm

Anxiety

avatar

moderator

okay, look.

all i know is that i really like the show 'big love' and i don't want it cancelled, okay? sad

sometimes a vegetarian is just a vegetarian
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 11/17/08 9:26pm

ZombieKitten

avatar

I guess they believe they will be rewarded in the afterlife for all the misery they suffer now confused
at least that was the impression I got from hearing the wives talk on a doco I saw recently, about a british non-practicing jewish guy, who had a revelation, moved to the US to become a rabbi with Jews for Jesus, took 7 wives, as he believes is right by god, and they all live in the same house, along with 9 or so kids.

grrrrrrr
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 11/17/08 11:22pm

meow85

avatar

Polygamy is sick and demeaning, but, leave polyamoury alone.
[Edited 11/18/08 22:43pm]

Real Men Wear Dresses*

*if anyone has a clue what I'm referring to, you get a cookie
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 11/18/08 4:23pm

lilgish

avatar

I'm for polyandry too, and what relationship dynamic has been more patriarchal and male dominated than monogamy?

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 11/18/08 9:40pm

meow85

avatar

lilgish said:

I'm for polyandry too, and what relationship dynamic has been more patriarchal and male dominated than monogamy?

That's an excellent point, actually.

It's a little hard IMO to justify being against polygamy with the reason that it's demeaning to women -though it undoubtedly is -when so-called traditional male/female pairings are just as bad.

Real Men Wear Dresses*

*if anyone has a clue what I'm referring to, you get a cookie
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 11/18/08 10:41pm

PurpleKnight

avatar

meow85 said:

lilgish said:

I'm for polyandry too, and what relationship dynamic has been more patriarchal and male dominated than monogamy?

That's an excellent point, actually.

It's a little hard IMO to justify being against polygamy with the reason that it's demeaning to women -though it undoubtedly is -when so-called traditional male/female pairings are just as bad.


I think you're missing the point. While every interpersonal relationship will inevitably be affected by patriarchal values, the exact extent is what is important. Polygamy is the ultimate expression of female subservience; several women working cooperatively to please their one man.

As a side note, to attempt to justify polyandry is just hypocritical. It's just another form of gender bias.

The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.

"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism."
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 11/18/08 10:43pm

meow85

avatar

PurpleKnight said:



I think you're missing the point. While every interpersonal relationship will inevitably be affected by patriarchal values, the exact extent is what is important. Polygamy is the ultimate expression of female subservience; several women working cooperatively to please their one man.
I don't see several women working to pelase one man as necessarily a greater example of female subserviance than one. It's just more people.


As a side note, to attempt to justify polyandry is just hypocritical. It's just another form of gender bias.

How so?

Real Men Wear Dresses*

*if anyone has a clue what I'm referring to, you get a cookie
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 11/18/08 10:47pm

PurpleKnight

avatar

meow85 said:

I don't see several women working to pelase one man as necessarily a greater example of female subserviance than one. It's just more people.


You must be kidding. The difference is that polygamy is structured in such a way that the direct implication is that a man's needs are superior. While the man gets to enjoy the emotional and physical gifts of several women, all of them are only worth a mere portion of a single person.

As a side note, to attempt to justify polyandry is just hypocritical. It's just another form of gender bias.

How so?


I simply see it as a form of reverse sexism.

The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.

"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism."
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 11/18/08 10:49pm

meow85

avatar

PurpleKnight said:

meow85 said:

I don't see several women working to pelase one man as necessarily a greater example of female subserviance than one. It's just more people.
How so?


I simply see it as a form of reverse sexism.

Fair enough.

What's your take on polyamoury, then?

Real Men Wear Dresses*

*if anyone has a clue what I'm referring to, you get a cookie
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 11/18/08 11:02pm

PurpleKnight

avatar

meow85 said:

PurpleKnight said:



I simply see it as a form of reverse sexism.

Fair enough.

What's your take on polyamoury, then?


I think polyamoury is absolutely wonderful, but the difficulty of maintaining it without it transforming into a gender-biased form (such as I believe polygamy and polyandry to be) is always of concern.

Compersion is an ideal mindset to achieve, but it requires overcoming years of socialization into the belief that romantic love is synonymous with entitlement over one's sexuality.

All in all, I really do believe monogamy is an archaic conception.

The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.

"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism."
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 11/18/08 11:11pm

meow85

avatar

PurpleKnight said:

meow85 said:


Fair enough.

What's your take on polyamoury, then?


I think polyamoury is absolutely wonderful, but the difficulty of maintaining it without it transforming into a gender-biased form (such as I believe polygamy and polyandry to be) is always of concern.

Compersion is an ideal mindset to achieve, but it requires overcoming years of socialization into the belief that romantic love is synonymous with entitlement over one's sexuality.

All in all, I really do believe monogamy is an archaic conception.


hmmm Interesting food for thought.

Oddly enough, we were just talking about polyamoury today in Philosophy....

Real Men Wear Dresses*

*if anyone has a clue what I'm referring to, you get a cookie
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 11/18/08 11:17pm

PurpleKnight

avatar

meow85 said:

PurpleKnight said:



I think polyamoury is absolutely wonderful, but the difficulty of maintaining it without it transforming into a gender-biased form (such as I believe polygamy and polyandry to be) is always of concern.

Compersion is an ideal mindset to achieve, but it requires overcoming years of socialization into the belief that romantic love is synonymous with entitlement over one's sexuality.

All in all, I really do believe monogamy is an archaic conception.


hmmm Interesting food for thought.

Oddly enough, we were just talking about polyamoury today in Philosophy....


I'm a Philosophy major. biggrin

I view sexuality as a potential means to erase the illusion of separation between people. When sex is used to both celebrate and promulgate love between various people, I believe the phenomenon is one of collective transcendence.

The impediment to this is, of course, personal jealousy. Jealousy is nothing more than an expression of insecurity and has no place in a so-called sophisticated thinking being. It is the inevitable reaction of a perceived threat to ownership of a partner's sexuality.

I really, truly hope this irrationality can be overcome. I believe it can, but gradually.

The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.

"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism."
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 11/18/08 11:31pm

meow85

avatar

PurpleKnight said:

meow85 said:



hmmm Interesting food for thought.

Oddly enough, we were just talking about polyamoury today in Philosophy....


I'm a Philosophy major. biggrin

I view sexuality as a potential means to erase the illusion of separation between people. When sex is used to both celebrate and promulgate love between various people, I believe the phenomenon is one of collective transcendence.

The impediment to this is, of course, personal jealousy. Jealousy is nothing more than an expression of insecurity and has no place in a so-called sophisticated thinking being. It is the inevitable reaction of a perceived threat to ownership of a partner's sexuality.

I really, truly hope this irrationality can be overcome. I believe it can, but gradually.



I agree. I think we're capable of getting past things like jealousy, but it would take a lot of work and I'm not sure where we'd start.

Real Men Wear Dresses*

*if anyone has a clue what I'm referring to, you get a cookie
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 11/18/08 11:38pm

PurpleKnight

avatar

meow85 said:

PurpleKnight said:



I'm a Philosophy major. biggrin

I view sexuality as a potential means to erase the illusion of separation between people. When sex is used to both celebrate and promulgate love between various people, I believe the phenomenon is one of collective transcendence.

The impediment to this is, of course, personal jealousy. Jealousy is nothing more than an expression of insecurity and has no place in a so-called sophisticated thinking being. It is the inevitable reaction of a perceived threat to ownership of a partner's sexuality.

I really, truly hope this irrationality can be overcome. I believe it can, but gradually.



I agree. I think we're capable of getting past things like jealousy, but it would take a lot of work and I'm not sure where we'd start.


With a smile and a martini.
[Edited 11/18/08 23:39pm]

The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.

"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism."
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 2 12>
Add a reply to this topic   Create new topic   Printable version   (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Politics & Religion > Leave the polygamist alone already...